Skip to main content

The Star

For this week I read The Star by Arthur C Clarke from 1956. One thing that I found interesting about this short story that I believe to be a theme in other pieces of the genre, is the acknowledgment of existential crisis. Everyone that is alive, thinks about how and when they will die. This usually is in accordance with "deep" thinking, outside of what we perceive and think of every day. This can and usually includes thinking about space and other civilizations beyond our own. This comes up in The Star as well. Although, in this situation, all of these mere speculations are true and can be seen through the character's eyes. We see that there is proof of other civilizations when they discover the monolith left behind by beings from another planet. We also are a part of the main character's thinking, in which he questions existence as well as his faith in God. We see that this scientist, astronomer, has a hard time separating scientific facts and proof with the belief in God. He even mentions getting harassed in a way for his beliefs, as most of the other scientists are notoriously atheists. "He who built the universe can destroy it when He chooses," is an example of how he shows his faith, but still questions why a God would choose to do it. This creates a really interesting dynamic. I really enjoyed how this short story brings up the topic of existence and death in a realistic way, which is surprising because of the time period that this was released. I wonder if it was a radical idea of thinking about existence outside of God during the '50s, as it was much more common to be religious during this time. Overall I enjoyed this short read and would be more interested to find a series of stories this length in this genre.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bloodchild

Discuss how the text(s) you read for this week's assignment did or did not reflect the values and perspectives of majoritarian culture. This piece did not reflect the values and perspective of majoritarian culture in the ways that it was portrayed as distinctly alien, and that humans were the invaders of another planet, and that in order to survive, humans had to have relationships with alien creatures that laid eggs inside of our intestines and organs. This storyline specifically is not something that people tend to think of on an everyday basis. The young main character of the story being chosen as the one to carry the alien babies, and going back and forth on whether to go through with it or not, is ultimately somehow a little bit closer to how we think. If there is any major decision we have to make as humans, it is often dragged out and thought over the possibilities many times before finalizing anything, let alone if other people's lives are at stake. This piece does re...

Interview with a Vampire

In this weeks reading, Interview with a Vampire,  something that stood out to me was the way the author depicted what was considered good versus evil. Since the majority of the book is told from Louis's perspective, through dialogue in his interview, we get to learn about his beliefs as a vampire versus the other vampires around him. For example, Louis is depicted as a generally good character at the beginning. This is shown through his squeamish and hesitant nature about killing humans and his empathy towards their lives. He also points out that he doesn't realize he is able to take animal's blood rather than a humans. This appears as a sense of morality. This morality is directly contradicted with the personality of Lestat. He is depicted as a tough vampire who doesn't feel empathy and will hunt anyone he pleases. Later in the book he turns a little girl into a vampire which leads to his "death." He later comes back to life on more than one occasion to get h...